|
Outside The Envelope
|
September 2000
|
Page 6
|
|
|
|
|
|
WAP, WAP, WAP!
No that's not an indication you missed a radial
tire recall notice. It's the cry by consumers for more products
employing Wireless Application Protocol. WAP allows wireless
access to the internet. So what will that do for you? For
starters, you can buy a Coke from a vending machine in Finland,
(Billing World Jul/Aug 2000, p.32) using your wireless phone.
Although we have the technology for employing a browser in
a wireless phone here in the U.S., ëcausal' billing is in
such disarray, (OTE
7/99: Wireless Pay-Per-Call?) you would be lucky to get
anything on your bill other than overcharges by an incumbent
telco or the product of cramming or slamming. Principal players
developing browser code for handset manufacturers are Nokia,
Phone.com, and Ericsson. As popular as WAP has become, developers
are already clamoring for change. For more, you are commended
to:
An
alternative has been developed by TeleVend, an Israeli company:
"Rather than requiring proprietary handsets and WAP server
gateways foisted on business-to-consumer vendors and their
customers, TeleVend technology puts the intelligence only
on the server, allowing consumers to use any phone to buy
sodas at vending machines, transfer money to ATMs, or pay
parking meters without having any coins in their pockets."(
www.infoworld.com
8/24/00, p.29) This is made possible because the vending machine
industry, unlike some PC manufacturers, have agreed upon a
single specification - DEX. The Digital EXchange specification,
managed by the Automatic Merchandisers Association, defines
how information is given out by the vending machince controller.
The vending industry is replacing 200,000 soda machines annually,
and almost all of the new machines are equipped with the DEX
specification. Why? Even though the incumbent LECs may not
be cooperating on casual billing, the DEX specification is
already increasing sales by allowing individual machines to
report their status directly to drivers - making sure supplies
go first to where they are most needed. IDT isn't waiting
for CLEC cooperation or the FTC 900 Rule to be completed to
launch a new pay-per-call service. I'm sure they don't classify
it as such, but the fact is that you pay each time you call.
(www.dmnews.com
7/31/00, p.63) The company is selling pagers - principally
to teenagers who will not have any monthly phone bill. The
charge of $.35 per call/page will likely appear on the phone
bill of their friends' parents. The fee will be announced
to the caller before the page is sent. When I asked Eileen
Harrington of the FTC how this application differed from the
ë500' number pay-per-call proposal - which included a free
time option and pricing announcement - she had no comment
because the sponsors have not asked the FTC for an opinion.
In the case of ë500' billing, the FTC issued a letter of opinion
that the service could not legally be offered in the way proposed
by the sponsors (www.ftc.gov/bcp/adcon/900rule/brecher.htm),.
Ms. Harrington did advise me that progress is being made on
the 900 Rule (see marked up version at www.ftc.gov/bcp/adcon/900rule/markup.pdf
and final revisions to the rule (see end of Federal Register
notice www.ftc.gov/os/1998/9810/63FR58523.pdf)should
be in place before year end.
|
|

|
|
All Articles Copyright
2000 Hattrick Publishing Group ã
|
|